Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post general topics related to Cubase Pro 8, Cubase Artist 8 and Cubase Elements 8 here.
uarte
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:51 pm
Contact:

Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by uarte » Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:43 pm

Dear Steinberg, please let us know when you will finally make good on your promise to release the new video engine for Cubase -- and not just Cubase 9, but also Cubase 8.5 as originally promised.

The new video engine has finally been released, but it has only been released for Nuendo 8 so far. Steinberg has promised in the past when this whole abandonment and security issue from Apple QT happened, that they were going to release the new engine for Cubase 8.5. However, the new engine was delayed for various reasons, including for licensing issues for various codecs.

In the extended delay, Steinberg released Cubase 9, and also (from what I understand, the last maintenance patch for Cubase 8.5).

Now that the licensing issues have finally been addressed, will Steinberg now come through with the new video engine and release it right away for both Cubase 8.5 and 9?

An update from Steinberg is surely in order.

So far, all they have said is that "Please note that a new video engine has been introduced with Nuendo 8 (Cubase will follow at a later point)" on their support page -- https://helpcenter.steinberg.de/hc/en-u ... and-Cubase

I'd love to know what "at a later point" means, and if they are including Cubase 8.5?

BaseCu
Member
Posts: 310
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by BaseCu » Wed Jun 21, 2017 3:27 pm

They've already said that 8.5.30 was the last C8 update -- i.e., you're not getting an updated video engine.
Studio One, Reaper, Sonar, Cubase | Win10 | i7 8750H/16 GB | RME Fireface UCX

uarte
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by uarte » Wed Jun 21, 2017 3:46 pm

Understood that 8.5.30 was theoretically the last update, but that doesn't mean they will not release the video engine update. After all they did promise it for 8.5. Since the video engine itself was supposedly finished a while ago (and just waiting for codec licensing issues), for all we know, the pipes for the new video engine are already included inside 8.5.30, and the video engine will be a separate installer. OR they WILL revise that statement and release a new 8.5.40 update with the new video engine. OR they will break a promise they made.

In any case, we deserve an answer, right?

uarte
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by uarte » Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:38 pm

FYI in case anyone missed it, Steinberg posted in another thread in the C9 forum:
We are planning to implement the new engine in Cubase 9 with the next maintenance update.
However, no word on Cubase 8.5 yet.

BaseCu
Member
Posts: 310
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by BaseCu » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:20 pm

Studio One, Reaper, Sonar, Cubase | Win10 | i7 8750H/16 GB | RME Fireface UCX

User avatar
jose7822
Member
Posts: 929
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:38 am
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by jose7822 » Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:20 am

Well, that's a shame.

If Steinberg can't be held accountable for what they say they'll do, then how can we trust a company like that? Now people who are perfectly fine using Cubase 8.5 are forced to upgrade to Cubase 9 if they want the new video engine -_-.
GIGABYTE X99 Designare EX | Intel Core i7 6800K (OC'ed to 4.2 GHz) | 64GB of Corsair Dominator Platinum (3333 MHz) | EVGA GTX 1070 FTW | Corsair H115i Water Cooler | Be Quiet! Dark Power Pro 1200 Watt PSU | Windows 10 Pro | Cubase Pro 10.0.40 64 bit | Studio One v4.5.3 | Dorico 3 | Lynx Aurora (n) 8TB | UAD 2 Octo | UAD 2 Quad

uarte
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by uarte » Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:00 am

It would be very disappointing indeed if Steinberg backs out of their promise. The whole problem developed well before Cubase 9 was released, and Steinberg promised the new video engine for Cubase 8.5. Even though they had several delays -- in part having to do with the licensing issues of some codecs (which has arguably nothing to do with the development of the video engine itself and the codecs that didn't require extra licensing) -- that's not an excuse to cancel a promised release for Cubase 8.5.

User avatar
jose7822
Member
Posts: 929
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:38 am
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by jose7822 » Fri Jun 23, 2017 5:57 pm

uarte wrote:It would be very disappointing indeed if Steinberg backs out of their promise. The whole problem developed well before Cubase 9 was released, and Steinberg promised the new video engine for Cubase 8.5. Even though they had several delays -- in part having to do with the licensing issues of some codecs (which has arguably nothing to do with the development of the video engine itself and the codecs that didn't require extra licensing) -- that's not an excuse to cancel a promised release for Cubase 8.5.
Exactly!
GIGABYTE X99 Designare EX | Intel Core i7 6800K (OC'ed to 4.2 GHz) | 64GB of Corsair Dominator Platinum (3333 MHz) | EVGA GTX 1070 FTW | Corsair H115i Water Cooler | Be Quiet! Dark Power Pro 1200 Watt PSU | Windows 10 Pro | Cubase Pro 10.0.40 64 bit | Studio One v4.5.3 | Dorico 3 | Lynx Aurora (n) 8TB | UAD 2 Octo | UAD 2 Quad

User avatar
shadowfax
Senior Member
Posts: 2758
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by shadowfax » Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:02 am

jose7822 wrote:Well, that's a shame.

If Steinberg can't be held accountable for what they say they'll do, then how can we trust a company like that? Now people who are perfectly fine using Cubase 8.5 are forced to upgrade to Cubase 9 if they want the new video engine -_-.

no your not..just get Studio one 3.5, that's what I've done....best move I've ever made, If Steinberg do not give the video to 8.5 users wouldn't that be illegal or something? when I upgraded from 7 I didn't expect to have an element of what I'd bought taken away from me never to return.. :o :o
they're not gonna force me to upgrade to 9 just to get the video engine..rather spend my money elsewhere..( bit more money I agree, but worth it ) :)

best, Kevin
https://soundcloud.com/knmac ... Cubase 10..Windows 10..Intel Core i9 9900K Coffee Lake Refresh 3.6GHz Eight Core 1151 Socket Overclockable Processor, WD Black WDS250G3X0C SN750 - 250GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD, ASRock AMD Radeon RX580 8GB OC Phantom Gaming D Dual Fan Graphics Card,
Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X Intel Socket 1151 ATX HDMI DDR4 USB C 3.1 M.2 Motherboard, 32GB ram, 2x Team GX2 1TB SATA III SSD. Yamaha N8.

uarte
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by uarte » Sun Jun 25, 2017 4:39 pm

shadowfax wrote:no your not..just get Studio one 3.5, that's what I've done....best move I've ever made, If Steinberg do not give the video to 8.5 users wouldn't that be illegal or something?
Hi Shadowfax! Great to see a long-time Cubase user reply to this. If memory serves, I think I remember you from all the way back from the old Cubase forum. Anyway, not to take this off-topic, but I promise to bring it back on topic --

1) In the interim of Steinberg's poor handling of the video engine situation, I also bought Studio One Pro, and I have to say, it's extremely impressive. I don't want to make this a product advertisement, but I think it's useful and honest to say that Steinberg has a lot to learn from their DAW-developing brethren over in Hamburg. Studio One has been a huge surprise to me -- the workflow, elegance and simplicity have convinced me that it's now a world-class DAW and quite frankly, in some key areas, I feel they've moved a full generation beyond Cubase.

HOWEVER, at least for my usage for film projects, I will be the first to admit that Cubase is still ahead of Studio One in two key areas that make it a tough choice for me to switch: a) Cubase still has superior MIDI tools for composers overall, and b) Cubase has other minor but important features that give it overall a stronger toolset for working with film. And I'm well aware that everyone has their own personal set of preferences and needs, so someone else might find even more (or less) to love about Cubase for their project requirements.

Having said that, the advantages of Studio One's superior interface and overall workflow IMO, plus the fact that in my testing it actually *performs* better, has been a real eye-opener, and I'm seriously considering moving a major film project over to Studio One, to my utter shock. In my moderately involved testing so far, Cubase feels comparatively bloated, laggy, glitchy, and frankly less intuitive (and this is coming from a long-time Cubase user).

I haven't decided yet, but I'm working on it.

2) I am embarrassed to say I broke my own promise to myself and I bought the Cubase 9 upgrade, in anticipation of Nuendo 8 and the new video engine, and I thought Steinberg was going to release the new video engine simultaneously. Well, I was wrong of course. To my great disappointment, Steinberg has chosen to release the new video engine just for Nuendo 8 so far, while saving the new engine for a future update to Cubase -- a product that has an EXISTING security issue by continuing to use the old engine. And to top that off, it looks like Steinberg may not even release the new engine for Cubase 8.5, breaking a promise they made.

Anyway, now that I have Studio One 3.5, Cubase 9 and Cubase 8.5, (among other DAW software) I've had the chance to test them back and forth with my kind of work, including on a fresh installation of Win 7 and Win 10. I'm saddened to say that Cubase 9 performance -- for me in both cases of Win 7 and Win 10 -- has been inferior to both Cubase 8.5 and Studio One 3.5.

I have also experienced crashes with Cubase 9 on both Win 7 and Win 10, along with a number of glitch issues that I almost can't believe are happening... Cubase 8.5 performs better for me! And Studio One Pro 3.5 performs better still!

While I will admit I like the lower zone, sampler track, and multiple marker tracks inside Cubase 9, overall, at least as of Cubase Pro 9.0.20, I'd have to revert back and use Cubase 8.5 on my system anyway! So I really regret jumping the gun and buying Cubase 9 at this point, except for the benefit of getting a little education about Steinberg's increasingly poor decisions about release cycles.

In any case, Steinberg's delay has opened a window for me to consider using Studio One as well. While I will miss certain key features of Cubase that I'm used to if I switch, I have to say the workflow in Studio One might just make up for it. I'm not there yet, but I'm very close to diving in completely with Studio One.

And to bring it all back on topic, it all comes back to Steinberg and their choices lately. I know I'm just one guy -- and yes, I've spent a lot of money on Steinberg over the years -- including on a variety of Steinberg and Yamaha hardware -- but Steinberg's pattern recently reminds me of the OLD Steinberg, back before Yamaha bought them and they were very inconsistent at times -- those were some really crappy years on and off for a while. I know I'm not the only person that feels this way... and if I'm right, Steinberg should take notice of what I'm seeing as a growing trend among long-time users that are growing increasingly frustrated.

And this whole video engine thing -- while seemingly minor -- is just one more little thing that might just tip the scales for me, personally. It's symptomatic of a Steinberg that, like Cubase, has become bloated, glitchy, and a generation behind in their thinking.

I do wish them well, and I hope they get their act together, but Cubase 9 is basically unusable for me (unless I want to accept the laggy, glitchy and more crash-prone environment, even compared to Cubase 8.5). So I've wasted my time and money, and hope the developers and team read this not as a complaint from a grumpy customer, but as a serious reminder of a long-time paying customer that has been there through Steinberg's ups and downs, that I'm getting tired of this process and I'm losing faith. For the first time in a long time, I regret paying for an upgrade. That's not a good sign.

I use other DAW software, like many of us do, but when it becomes a CHORE to use a particular tool, or when you can't trust a developer, you know something is wrong. This isn't a complaint to Steinberg... this is an appeal to Steinberg to raise the level of their own expectations.

And they can start by releasing the new video engine for Cubase 8.5, as they promised.

BaseCu
Member
Posts: 310
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by BaseCu » Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:08 pm

I too am in the process of moving my projects from Cubase to Studio One. I was planning/hoping to be a long-time Cubase user but the combination of a disappointing C9 release, failure to fix long-standing bugs, and increased disregard for their product and the customers that use it has soured me on Steinberg.

I've decided to wait and see what happens with C10. If it meaningfully addresses the above issues, I'll stick with Cubase. If not, I'll switch to Studio One (which should be at version 4 by that time). Cheers...
Studio One, Reaper, Sonar, Cubase | Win10 | i7 8750H/16 GB | RME Fireface UCX

User avatar
shadowfax
Senior Member
Posts: 2758
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by shadowfax » Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:28 am

uarte wrote:
shadowfax wrote:no your not..just get Studio one 3.5, that's what I've done....best move I've ever made, If Steinberg do not give the video to 8.5 users wouldn't that be illegal or something?
Hi Shadowfax! Great to see a long-time Cubase user reply to this. If memory serves, I think I remember you from all the way back from the old Cubase forum. Anyway, not to take this off-topic, but I promise to bring it back on topic --

1) In the interim of Steinberg's poor handling of the video engine situation, I also bought Studio One Pro, and I have to say, it's extremely impressive. I don't want to make this a product advertisement, but I think it's useful and honest to say that Steinberg has a lot to learn from their DAW-developing brethren over in Hamburg. Studio One has been a huge surprise to me -- the workflow, elegance and simplicity have convinced me that it's now a world-class DAW and quite frankly, in some key areas, I feel they've moved a full generation beyond Cubase.

HOWEVER, at least for my usage for film projects, I will be the first to admit that Cubase is still ahead of Studio One in two key areas that make it a tough choice for me to switch: a) Cubase still has superior MIDI tools for composers overall, and b) Cubase has other minor but important features that give it overall a stronger toolset for working with film. And I'm well aware that everyone has their own personal set of preferences and needs, so someone else might find even more (or less) to love about Cubase for their project requirements.

Having said that, the advantages of Studio One's superior interface and overall workflow IMO, plus the fact that in my testing it actually *performs* better, has been a real eye-opener, and I'm seriously considering moving a major film project over to Studio One, to my utter shock. In my moderately involved testing so far, Cubase feels comparatively bloated, laggy, glitchy, and frankly less intuitive (and this is coming from a long-time Cubase user).

I haven't decided yet, but I'm working on it.

2) I am embarrassed to say I broke my own promise to myself and I bought the Cubase 9 upgrade, in anticipation of Nuendo 8 and the new video engine, and I thought Steinberg was going to release the new video engine simultaneously. Well, I was wrong of course. To my great disappointment, Steinberg has chosen to release the new video engine just for Nuendo 8 so far, while saving the new engine for a future update to Cubase -- a product that has an EXISTING security issue by continuing to use the old engine. And to top that off, it looks like Steinberg may not even release the new engine for Cubase 8.5, breaking a promise they made.

Anyway, now that I have Studio One 3.5, Cubase 9 and Cubase 8.5, (among other DAW software) I've had the chance to test them back and forth with my kind of work, including on a fresh installation of Win 7 and Win 10. I'm saddened to say that Cubase 9 performance -- for me in both cases of Win 7 and Win 10 -- has been inferior to both Cubase 8.5 and Studio One 3.5.

I have also experienced crashes with Cubase 9 on both Win 7 and Win 10, along with a number of glitch issues that I almost can't believe are happening... Cubase 8.5 performs better for me! And Studio One Pro 3.5 performs better still!

While I will admit I like the lower zone, sampler track, and multiple marker tracks inside Cubase 9, overall, at least as of Cubase Pro 9.0.20, I'd have to revert back and use Cubase 8.5 on my system anyway! So I really regret jumping the gun and buying Cubase 9 at this point, except for the benefit of getting a little education about Steinberg's increasingly poor decisions about release cycles.

In any case, Steinberg's delay has opened a window for me to consider using Studio One as well. While I will miss certain key features of Cubase that I'm used to if I switch, I have to say the workflow in Studio One might just make up for it. I'm not there yet, but I'm very close to diving in completely with Studio One.

And to bring it all back on topic, it all comes back to Steinberg and their choices lately. I know I'm just one guy -- and yes, I've spent a lot of money on Steinberg over the years -- including on a variety of Steinberg and Yamaha hardware -- but Steinberg's pattern recently reminds me of the OLD Steinberg, back before Yamaha bought them and they were very inconsistent at times -- those were some really crappy years on and off for a while. I know I'm not the only person that feels this way... and if I'm right, Steinberg should take notice of what I'm seeing as a growing trend among long-time users that are growing increasingly frustrated.

And this whole video engine thing -- while seemingly minor -- is just one more little thing that might just tip the scales for me, personally. It's symptomatic of a Steinberg that, like Cubase, has become bloated, glitchy, and a generation behind in their thinking.

I do wish them well, and I hope they get their act together, but Cubase 9 is basically unusable for me (unless I want to accept the laggy, glitchy and more crash-prone environment, even compared to Cubase 8.5). So I've wasted my time and money, and hope the developers and team read this not as a complaint from a grumpy customer, but as a serious reminder of a long-time paying customer that has been there through Steinberg's ups and downs, that I'm getting tired of this process and I'm losing faith. For the first time in a long time, I regret paying for an upgrade. That's not a good sign.

I use other DAW software, like many of us do, but when it becomes a CHORE to use a particular tool, or when you can't trust a developer, you know something is wrong. This isn't a complaint to Steinberg... this is an appeal to Steinberg to raise the level of their own expectations.

And they can start by releasing the new video engine for Cubase 8.5, as they promised.

I agree with everything you say...my move to Studio one is permanent!!...apart from everything else I have projects that Cubase 8.5 just cannot handle while Studio one runs at around 40% and Mixbus at around 50%..Cubase is banging the red all the time..not matter what permutation of the power scheme I use...
moving to Studio one was like getting off an old bus and boarding a spaceship... 8-)
you can also use all the Cubase shortcuts in Studio one...

I would be happy to stay with Cubase because it is a good DAW..no doubt about that!! but what the heck are they doing to it? and their update policy is...well, you'll just have to wait..wont ya!!
and if they do not give the update to cubase 8.5 users in a desperate attempt to force them onto 9 then, that's all you need to know about their attitude to their customer base!!

best to all and I hope Cubase 8.5 users get their video engine... :) :)
https://soundcloud.com/knmac ... Cubase 10..Windows 10..Intel Core i9 9900K Coffee Lake Refresh 3.6GHz Eight Core 1151 Socket Overclockable Processor, WD Black WDS250G3X0C SN750 - 250GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD, ASRock AMD Radeon RX580 8GB OC Phantom Gaming D Dual Fan Graphics Card,
Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X Intel Socket 1151 ATX HDMI DDR4 USB C 3.1 M.2 Motherboard, 32GB ram, 2x Team GX2 1TB SATA III SSD. Yamaha N8.

uarte
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by uarte » Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:30 pm

shadowfax wrote:best to all and I hope Cubase 8.5 users get their video engine... :) :)
Crossing fingers 8.5 gets the new engine, but I'm getting the vibe that it won't. The silence on the issue is deafening. I hope I'm wrong, but I think Steinberg is bailing on Cubase 8.5. They have already announced that upcoming patches for Nuendo 7 and Cubase 9 will have the new engine, but no mention of C8.5. Sure, that's welcome (and expected) news for N7 and C9, but very frustrating that they chose to wait even longer for existing security issues compared to releasing a new product - N8. That says a lot right there IMO.

At this point I can't use Cubase 9.0.20 due to glitches, lag and crashes. Cubase 8.5.30 is more solid for me. As much as I hate to say it, Studio One looks better and better each passing day. Started a 5-minute film scoring project in Studio One 3.5 this week for a film. Looking forward to seeing how it holds up compared to C8.5. I've already taken C9 off the table for now.

Very frustrated.

PeppaPig
Member
Posts: 914
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2015 5:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by PeppaPig » Mon Jun 26, 2017 11:44 pm

shadowfax wrote: no your not..just get Studio one 3.5, that's what I've done....best move I've ever made, (snip)
I've been hearing great things about Studio One, the only thing that puts me off is lack of chord tracks - I use them all the time on Cubase for sketching stuff out. If they were to introduce something similar in S1 I think I'd jump ship. Sad to say - I love Cubase but performance and stability have just got steadily worse since V7. I now have a monster of a machine and it still doesn't feel snappy although I've not run out of CPU (yet) on the new machine. Mixbus and Reaper fly - but then they did on my old PC too.
Cubase Pro 10.00.40, 9.5, Pro9.0.20. WaveLab 9 EL. UA Apollo Quad FW, UA PCI Octo, UA Satelite Quad, Adam T5V, Golden Audio pre73 DLX, Behringer ADA8200, Joe Meek AC3, Intel i7 6850x@4.2Ghz (6C/12T), Asus x99 Deluxe II, AMD 6450 HD, Windows 10 Pro, Samsung 860 and 850 SSDs, 64Gb RAM - Melodyne Studio, Komplete ultimate 11, Halion 6, GA,GA2,GA3,GA4 (+sp), OZ6, OZ7, OZ8 adv, Neutron Adv, BFD3, SoundToys rack, Panorama P1, M-Audio Oxygen, Yamaha YPP55 - outboard: PRO VLAII, Digitech Time machine RDS4000, 1950s Ferrograph Series 5, Mics: AKG C1000S, Rode NT2A and M5 pair, SE2200A, SE X1R, Fame-VT67 (cheap valve U67 clone), Heil PR20&PR22, Behringer Mic2200 used for reamping with a bit of nastiness!

User avatar
shadowfax
Senior Member
Posts: 2758
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by shadowfax » Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:58 am

PeppaPig wrote:
shadowfax wrote: no your not..just get Studio one 3.5, that's what I've done....best move I've ever made, (snip)
I've been hearing great things about Studio One, the only thing that puts me off is lack of chord tracks - I use them all the time on Cubase for sketching stuff out. If they were to introduce something similar in S1 I think I'd jump ship. Sad to say - I love Cubase but performance and stability have just got steadily worse since V7. I now have a monster of a machine and it still doesn't feel snappy although I've not run out of CPU (yet) on the new machine. Mixbus and Reaper fly - but then they did on my old PC too.

Yeah, I miss the the chord track also...but I've reached my limit of what I'll put up with!!
the only way to show Steiny you mean business is to move on and take your money elsewhere...I managed before the chord track, I'll manage without the chord track...I wouldn't bet against S1 coming up with something similar in the not too distant future though..

best, Kevin :)
Last edited by shadowfax on Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
https://soundcloud.com/knmac ... Cubase 10..Windows 10..Intel Core i9 9900K Coffee Lake Refresh 3.6GHz Eight Core 1151 Socket Overclockable Processor, WD Black WDS250G3X0C SN750 - 250GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD, ASRock AMD Radeon RX580 8GB OC Phantom Gaming D Dual Fan Graphics Card,
Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X Intel Socket 1151 ATX HDMI DDR4 USB C 3.1 M.2 Motherboard, 32GB ram, 2x Team GX2 1TB SATA III SSD. Yamaha N8.

User avatar
jose7822
Member
Posts: 929
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:38 am
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by jose7822 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:20 am

shadowfax wrote:
jose7822 wrote:Well, that's a shame.

If Steinberg can't be held accountable for what they say they'll do, then how can we trust a company like that? Now people who are perfectly fine using Cubase 8.5 are forced to upgrade to Cubase 9 if they want the new video engine -_-.

no your not..just get Studio one 3.5, that's what I've done....best move I've ever made, If Steinberg do not give the video to 8.5 users wouldn't that be illegal or something? when I upgraded from 7 I didn't expect to have an element of what I'd bought taken away from me never to return.. :o :o
they're not gonna force me to upgrade to 9 just to get the video engine..rather spend my money elsewhere..( bit more money I agree, but worth it ) :)

best, Kevin
I did get Studio One v3 a few months ago and I LOVE IT!

Unfortunately, as uarte mentions, Studio One is a bit behind when it comes to MIDI and Film scoring tools. Otherwise, I agree that the workflow in Studio One is MUCH better than Cubase. It is such a pleasing experience, so I really hope that version 4 brings in the missing tools that will make it my go to DAW for everything music.

In the mean time, I will NOT be upgrading my Cubase license until I see that Steinberg has done us right by fixing long standing bugs, as well as improving the workflow and stability of Cubase. Until then, it is Studio One for me. Presonus actually cares about their products and they listen to their customers, so that's where my money is going :-).

Take care!
GIGABYTE X99 Designare EX | Intel Core i7 6800K (OC'ed to 4.2 GHz) | 64GB of Corsair Dominator Platinum (3333 MHz) | EVGA GTX 1070 FTW | Corsair H115i Water Cooler | Be Quiet! Dark Power Pro 1200 Watt PSU | Windows 10 Pro | Cubase Pro 10.0.40 64 bit | Studio One v4.5.3 | Dorico 3 | Lynx Aurora (n) 8TB | UAD 2 Octo | UAD 2 Quad

morak_1922
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2017 5:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by morak_1922 » Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:45 pm

I bought Cubase 8.5 Pro for working with music for video clips and movies. I knew about QT engine problem but I also read Steinberg promise to update this engine.
One year after purchase I still can't import ANY video (I'm on Win10 PC) into Cubase because new video engine wasn't updated.
And as I saw in another topic - Steinberg guy said its final maintenance patch for C8.5 Pro

Here are two soultions (if Steinberg really don't want to update 8.5Pro anymore):
1. I want full refund of my license, it's useless to me (I used this software for 10 hours over ONE YEAR, configuration purposes mostly) and you didn't deliver product you advertised (in features of C8.5 there is clearly said VIDEO SUPPORT).
2. Give me a free upgrade to Cubase 9 where new video engine is working as advertised. I already got mail with offer for Cubase 9 upgrade for 40% of price, but hell no! I will not pay for another crippled software with broken promises.

Can anybody give me some links where I can contact steinberg about refund / licensing issue? Because I can't find anything and I don't want to wait any longer.

User avatar
shadowfax
Senior Member
Posts: 2758
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by shadowfax » Mon Jul 17, 2017 7:53 pm

morak_1922 wrote:
Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:45 pm
I bought Cubase 8.5 Pro for working with music for video clips and movies. I knew about QT engine problem but I also read Steinberg promise to update this engine.
One year after purchase I still can't import ANY video (I'm on Win10 PC) into Cubase because new video engine wasn't updated.
And as I saw in another topic - Steinberg guy said its final maintenance patch for C8.5 Pro

Here are two soultions (if Steinberg really don't want to update 8.5Pro anymore):
1. I want full refund of my license, it's useless to me (I used this software for 10 hours over ONE YEAR, configuration purposes mostly) and you didn't deliver product you advertised (in features of C8.5 there is clearly said VIDEO SUPPORT).
2. Give me a free upgrade to Cubase 9 where new video engine is working as advertised. I already got mail with offer for Cubase 9 upgrade for 40% of price, but hell no! I will not pay for another crippled software with broken promises.

Can anybody give me some links where I can contact steinberg about refund / licensing issue? Because I can't find anything and I don't want to wait any longer.

Your dead right my friend, If they do not update 8.5 with a video engine they've got to be in breach of some law or other, I, like you bought a product that had a video engine..now it hasn't, and for so, so long..they really are taking the PEE out of us...I'm sure they are hoping the long wait will force peeps onto 9....didn't work with me, I bought Studio one...
best of luck to you my friend :) :)
https://soundcloud.com/knmac ... Cubase 10..Windows 10..Intel Core i9 9900K Coffee Lake Refresh 3.6GHz Eight Core 1151 Socket Overclockable Processor, WD Black WDS250G3X0C SN750 - 250GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD, ASRock AMD Radeon RX580 8GB OC Phantom Gaming D Dual Fan Graphics Card,
Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X Intel Socket 1151 ATX HDMI DDR4 USB C 3.1 M.2 Motherboard, 32GB ram, 2x Team GX2 1TB SATA III SSD. Yamaha N8.

ckon
Member
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:16 am
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by ckon » Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:45 pm

If a promise means nothing to the folk currently calling the shots for Steinberg then they do not deserve to make one sale of anything new.

R.E studio one, having spent a bit of testing time on it I have been recommending this to others who are not in a MacOS environment (logic) and do not do extensive video scoring work.

p.s forum looks terrible.
ckon:

C Pro 10.0.40 (and all previous)
Win7 - x64 (farewell soon)
Main host system:
i7 3770k - 4.5GHZ, 32GB RAM, OS on SSD
Museum DAW: Apple Mac LCII Opcode Studio Vision.

jaromematthew
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 7:44 am
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by jaromematthew » Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:10 am

morak_1922 wrote:
Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:45 pm
Here are two soultions (if Steinberg really don't want to update 8.5Pro anymore):
1. I want full refund of my license, it's useless to me (I used this software for 10 hours over ONE YEAR, configuration purposes mostly) and you didn't deliver product you advertised (in features of C8.5 there is clearly said VIDEO SUPPORT).
2. Give me a free upgrade to Cubase 9 where new video engine is working as advertised. I already got mail with offer for Cubase 9 upgrade for 40% of price, but hell no! I will not pay for another crippled software with broken promises.
Don't waste your time, I have been trying to get some kind of compensation for so many hours lost due to terrible bugs in Cubase 8.5 with Steinberg for over 6 months and there very clear message is "We don't care". They continually refuse to admit there are bugs crippling Cubase now and could care less about long time users like myself (I have been going since Cubase 1.0).
It's a difficult problem to deal with, you have a very powerful DAW, one can argue much more powerful out of the box than Pro Tools, and the company has been around so long that they really don't need to care about long time customers any more which is sad because its a great software that could be number one in the market if not for the poor support and declining technical performance.
It's really such a shame big companies now just care about marketing and features rather than making stable, functional software, Apple being one of the worst, so how can we expect Steinberg to be better? It's an epidemic and were the perpetual beta testing victims.
Nuendo 8, Cubase 9, Mac Pro 2.6Ghz Quad- Core Xeon, 16G ram, ATI Radeon HD5770, RME HDSPe, UCX, NI Komplete 9, Omnisphere 2, Waves Platinum + many singles, Izotope RX6, Neutron 2, EW Play 5.0, Sound Toys singles, Slate Raven MTi 2.0

Romantique Tp
External Moderator
Posts: 2878
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 3:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by Romantique Tp » Fri Jul 28, 2017 4:02 pm

jaromematthew wrote:
Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:10 am
It's really such a shame big companies now just care about marketing and features rather than making stable, functional software
The best part is that Cubase 9 was released with a bigger focus on stability but some people are refusing to upgrade because there's apparently not enough new features.
Every time someone says "it must be easy to add/fix", a programmer dies.

Cubase Pro and Wavelab Pro (latest), Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit, MSI Z87-G45 GAMING, i5 4690k, GeForce GTX 760, almost every Steinberg plugin and expansion, Trilian, Komplete 10, etc etc etc etc

BaseCu
Member
Posts: 310
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by BaseCu » Sat Jul 29, 2017 7:32 pm

Romantique Tp wrote:
Fri Jul 28, 2017 4:02 pm
jaromematthew wrote:
Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:10 am
It's really such a shame big companies now just care about marketing and features rather than making stable, functional software
The best part is that Cubase 9 was released with a bigger focus on stability but some people are refusing to upgrade because there's apparently not enough new features.
I chose not to upgrade because stability (or lack thereof) is still a big issue. And ditto for the numerous, known annoying bugs that have existed for years and the overall sluggishness compared to other DAWs.

I would gladly have upgraded if they addressed these issues and did nothing else.
Studio One, Reaper, Sonar, Cubase | Win10 | i7 8750H/16 GB | RME Fireface UCX

uarte
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by uarte » Thu Aug 17, 2017 2:03 pm

FYI, Cubase 9 just got the new video engine -- no additional news for Cubase 8.5 so far -- viewtopic.php?f=250&t=122140

User avatar
shadowfax
Senior Member
Posts: 2758
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 3:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by shadowfax » Thu Aug 17, 2017 5:35 pm

they really are quite nasty aren't they!! the video engine should've been issued for 8.5 at the same time as 9,,,,,
disgusting behavior...desperately trying to force peeps on to 9,
they don't care about long term users because they already have our money...
https://soundcloud.com/knmac ... Cubase 10..Windows 10..Intel Core i9 9900K Coffee Lake Refresh 3.6GHz Eight Core 1151 Socket Overclockable Processor, WD Black WDS250G3X0C SN750 - 250GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD, ASRock AMD Radeon RX580 8GB OC Phantom Gaming D Dual Fan Graphics Card,
Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X Intel Socket 1151 ATX HDMI DDR4 USB C 3.1 M.2 Motherboard, 32GB ram, 2x Team GX2 1TB SATA III SSD. Yamaha N8.

uarte
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Promised video engine update for Cubase 8.5

Post by uarte » Thu Aug 17, 2017 6:54 pm

I'm not really sure what to say about this, Shadowfax... because I'm still kind of surprised by Steinberg's behavior and performance. Part of me is still holding out a tiny hope that they will make good on their promise for Cubase 8.5, because it's the RIGHT thing to do... but I doubt they'll do it. I think we are seeing a Steinberg that has made some decisions lately -- for whatever reason -- to destroy their credibility, sense of responsibility and decency to long-term customers. Their silence on this issue says a lot too. They've even given up talking to us about it.

FYI Nuendo 7 hasn't received the update either yet, and they were told they would get it 4-6 weeks after Nuendo 8 was released, and we're now OVER 8 weeks for them (let alone 1 year and 4 months since the announcement of the issue!!!!!!)!!!!! So it's clear that Steinberg can't meet a SINGLE deadline of their own timeline! They might as well stop mentioning dates at all, ever. The ONLY date they are good at meeting is a NEW yearly release date to collect upgrade fees.

But I like to consider myself an optimistic person and hope that maybe 8.5 will be a really nice big surprise in a few days or weeks. However, I doubt it. Again, their silence is telling. At least with Nuendo 7 they've recently indicated that it's on the way.

Sadly, unless they turn this ship around, they have essentially lost me as a customer, and I regret sending them any more money recently. I regretfully already upgraded to Cubase 9 when I should NOT have done that, and Cubase 9 up to this point has been LESS reliable than 8.5. I own a bunch of their other products, but at least as of this moment, they have basically lost my trust as a company due to this whole fiasco. It says a lot about them as a company IMO.

Frankly, they need to STOP this foolish yearly update cycle where they release half-baked features, introduce various new problems, are sluggish at fixing older problems, and sometimes fail to fix major issues (like the whole video engine situation) in a timely manner, and basically fail to meet EVERY SINGLE time estimate they've given us... repeatedly.

Whoever the Cubase project manager is at Steinberg, needs to be fired. And whoever decides the roadmap, priorities and resources in general needs to be fired (if that's a different person). In fact, as far as I'm concerned, they ARE fired, at least from my wallet, because I will not send another dollar to Steinberg unless they provide the new video engine for 8.5 as they originally promised.

I can say this with confidence: Cubase is no longer going to be my primary DAW. I have spent a lot of time investigating and testing other DAWs recently, and the marketplace for great DAW software is better than ever. Steinberg has a great legacy to be sure, but they have squandered their good will with me, and I can promise there will be NO more revenue and upgrade fees from me going forward, unless they do the right thing here.

Post Reply

Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests