Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

All topics on WaveLab 8 and WaveLab Elements 8
Post Reply
razor7music
Junior Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:19 pm
Contact:

Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

Post by razor7music » Wed Apr 24, 2013 12:09 am

Hello All--

I bought WL7 in time to get the free upgrade to WL8 and I have been watching videos and reading articles about the new dithering algorithm from Izotpoe and I'm working on a Dance Pop track that I am wondering if it's worth pushing off a little until 8 comes out.

Of course it's not just the dithering but the other features I'm wondering about as well. I suppose I can master it in 7 and re-master it in 8, but I have other projects I can move around and wait until 8 comes out to do any mastering of the Dance Pop song.

What are your thoughts? :?:
Thanks,


Stephen

Cakewalk by Bandlab
Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit
ADK DAW-
Intel i7 4930K CPU
Core i7 SB-E MOBO
16 GB DDR3 RAM
7 TB Storage
Layla 3G SoundCard (11.5 ms Roundtrip Latency)
UAD-2 DSP
WaveLab 8.5 Pro 64-bit
Sound Forge 10 Pro

Vocalpoint
Member
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

Post by Vocalpoint » Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:14 pm

razor7music wrote:Hello All--

I bought WL7 in time to get the free upgrade to WL8 and I have been watching videos and reading articles about the new dithering algorithm from Izotpoe and I'm working on a Dance Pop track that I am wondering if it's worth pushing off a little until 8 comes out.

Of course it's not just the dithering but the other features I'm wondering about as well. I suppose I can master it in 7 and re-master it in 8, but I have other projects I can move around and wait until 8 comes out to do any mastering of the Dance Pop song.

What are your thoughts? :?:
I wouldn't think there would a single human ear out there that would notice any difference in a dithering algorithm - especially in a dance pop track. I say roll on with what you have.

Cheers,

VP
Bruce McDonald
Vocalpoint Studios
Calgary, AB Canada

TimoWildenhain
Moderator
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:51 am
Contact:

Re: Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

Post by TimoWildenhain » Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:46 pm

Vocalpoint wrote:
razor7music wrote:Hello All--

I bought WL7 in time to get the free upgrade to WL8 and I have been watching videos and reading articles about the new dithering algorithm from Izotpoe and I'm working on a Dance Pop track that I am wondering if it's worth pushing off a little until 8 comes out.

Of course it's not just the dithering but the other features I'm wondering about as well. I suppose I can master it in 7 and re-master it in 8, but I have other projects I can move around and wait until 8 comes out to do any mastering of the Dance Pop song.

What are your thoughts? :?:
I wouldn't think there would a single human ear out there that would notice any difference in a dithering algorithm - especially in a dance pop track. I say roll on with what you have.

Cheers,

VP
Hello,

not saying this because I'd like to sell the product ;) BUT you can actually really hear the difference.
This is much more advanced than the (meanwhile quite old) Apogee dither.

Thanks,
Timo
Timo Wildenhain - Head of Business Unit
Professional Audio Unit
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
Hamburg, Germany
Checkout Steinberg on YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and MySpace!

PG
Moderator
Posts: 6642
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

Post by PG » Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:34 pm

WaveLab 8 has a new mode called "Monitor 16 bit dithering", in the Master Section. When activated, it amplifies the dithered signal by +48dB, to make it clearly audible. This works with any dithering plugin, hence you will be able to make your own comparisons. In any case, to hear dithering, use decaying sounds such as piano or voices. When they reach silence, quantization noise is clearly heard if there is no dithering.

Izotope dithering is very soft to my ears.
Philippe

razor7music
Junior Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

Post by razor7music » Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:41 pm

PG wrote:WaveLab 8 has a new mode called "Monitor 16 bit dithering", in the Master Section. When activated, it amplifies the dithered signal by +48dB, to make it clearly audible. This works with any dithering plugin, hence you will be able to make your own comparisons. In any case, to hear dithering, use decaying sounds such as piano or voices. When they reach silence, quantization noise is clearly heard if there is no dithering.

Izotope dithering is very soft to my ears.
When you say I can use the monitoring to compare, does that mean the Apogee dithering algo will still be part of WL8 along side Izotope?
Thanks,


Stephen

Cakewalk by Bandlab
Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit
ADK DAW-
Intel i7 4930K CPU
Core i7 SB-E MOBO
16 GB DDR3 RAM
7 TB Storage
Layla 3G SoundCard (11.5 ms Roundtrip Latency)
UAD-2 DSP
WaveLab 8.5 Pro 64-bit
Sound Forge 10 Pro

PG
Moderator
Posts: 6642
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

Post by PG » Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:29 pm

When you say I can use the monitoring to compare, does that mean the Apogee dithering algo will still be part of WL8 along side Izotope?
Yes.
Philippe

panatrope
New Member
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:09 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

Post by panatrope » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:49 am

PG wrote:WaveLab 8 has a new mode called "Monitor 16 bit dithering", in the Master Section. When activated, it amplifies the dithered signal by +48dB, to make it clearly audible.
Interesting. This appears to be a an ASL (Arithmetic Shift Left, assuming MSB is on the 'left') by 8 bits, to remove the 8 most significant 0s to preserve bit-wise the exact dithering pattern to allow this comparison.

You may recall I have previously asked for the possibly of a facility for 'volume' change by a nominated amount of bits (LSR/LSL)for this particular purpose and for other forensic purposes.

This general facility wouldn't have made it into WL8, perchance?
De gustibus - et sonus - non disputandum est

PG
Moderator
Posts: 6642
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

Post by PG » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:53 am

You may recall I have previously asked for the possibly of a facility for 'volume' change by a nominated amount of bits (LSR/LSL)for this particular purpose and for other forensic purposes.
This general facility wouldn't have made it into WL8, perchance?
No, sorry
Philippe

razor7music
Junior Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

Post by razor7music » Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:47 pm

PG wrote:
When you say I can use the monitoring to compare, does that mean the Apogee dithering algo will still be part of WL8 along side Izotope?
Yes.
That's cool. :D
Thanks,


Stephen

Cakewalk by Bandlab
Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit
ADK DAW-
Intel i7 4930K CPU
Core i7 SB-E MOBO
16 GB DDR3 RAM
7 TB Storage
Layla 3G SoundCard (11.5 ms Roundtrip Latency)
UAD-2 DSP
WaveLab 8.5 Pro 64-bit
Sound Forge 10 Pro

User avatar
Bane
Senior Member
Posts: 1728
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:57 am
Contact:

Re: Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

Post by Bane » Sat Apr 27, 2013 8:14 pm

I agree with Vocalpoint. I have personally used Apogee UV22HR (sometimes even the legacy version) on all my tracks. I've never heard a single bit of difference. Apogee has been used in Cubase by tons of people for ages. If you have iZotope's, use it; but other dithering plugins wont be a showstopper on your tracks. I just wouldn't recommend using dithering as an excuse to buy v8. There are plenty of better reasons. ;)
Asus R500A-RS52, Windows 8, 2.6gHz i5 -3230M, 6GB RAM,

Cubase Artist 7.0.6, Wavelab Elements 7, Focusrite Scarlett 8i6, The Grand 3, Melodyne Essential, Superior Drummer, EZDrummer and Pop! EZX, Samson CO1, Yamaha P-35, Mackie MR5mk2 monitors, and more....

My tunes on: Soundcloud

Vocalpoint
Member
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Izotope Dithering That Much Better Than Apogee?

Post by Vocalpoint » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:36 pm

Bane wrote:I agree with Vocalpoint. I have personally used Apogee UV22HR (sometimes even the legacy version) on all my tracks. I've never heard a single bit of difference. Apogee has been used in Cubase by tons of people for ages. If you have iZotope's, use it; but other dithering plugins wont be a showstopper on your tracks. I just wouldn't recommend using dithering as an excuse to buy v8. There are plenty of better reasons. ;)
Thanks! As I have I have iZotope RX2 and Soundforge 10 - which both sport the MBIT+ dithering - I have had plenty of opportunity to compare these with the Apogee - and like I mentioned - if you can really tell the difference - your ears are light years beyond mine.

They all sound great...but MBIT+ is no where near a strong enough "must have" feature that should sway someone into WL8.

VP
Bruce McDonald
Vocalpoint Studios
Calgary, AB Canada

Post Reply

Return to “WaveLab 8 | WaveLab Elements 8”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest